| Welcome to Pokemon Tabletop. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Alternate Type Ace; Without Type Changes | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 15 2012, 05:02 PM (1,591 Views) | |
| bakoren | Jul 18 2012, 08:49 AM Post #11 |
![]()
Team Sprocket Executive
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I feel like you keep building a more defensive Type Ace....I know I'm an idiot when it comes to the rules but I feel like the Type Ace should be an aggressive, combative type of class. |
![]() |
|
| Darchias | Jul 18 2012, 10:00 PM Post #12 |
|
Pokémon Trainer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The problem with the first one he made was that it wasn't defensive enough, though I somewhat agree that this one focuses just a smidge too much on defense. Then again, I like Type Ace exactly the way it is and don't really like the new class to begin with, so perhaps my input should not be valued highly. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Pokemon: Tabletop Homebrew · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
7:26 AM Jul 11
|
Pokéball created by Sarah & Delirium of the ZNR






![]](http://z4.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)



7:26 AM Jul 11